[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
abstract classes too abstract!
- To: <xtech>
- Subject: abstract classes too abstract!
- From: Eric Dean Tribble <tribble>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 90 20:18:11 PDT
Abstract classes can have some actual implementation! I've noticed
several places in which an obvious implementation in an abstract class
was replaced by subclassResponsibility. A particular case is
TableStepper get. It can certainly just send test, and blast on a
NULL. How about Region hasMember.IntegerVar?