[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] :gzz: Correction: I was using 0704 version till yesterday. Best, T
- To: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] :gzz: Correction: I was using 0704 version till yesterday. Best, T
- From: "Tuomas J. Lukka" <lukka@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:11:57 +0300 (EEST)
- Cc: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20000711142240.F18486@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sounds better. That means we can get rid of build-tag.txt completely!
> > Except for explicit versions (0.01 anyone ;)
> Why? You just edit Makefile the way you would've edited build-tag.txt.
Right, of course... or maybe
make VERSION=0.01 version
would be easiest; editing a file and then tagging it in CVS would
not be good.
> > Hmm.. would it waste CVS resources to tag the release that is
> > snapshotted? That might sometimes come in useful...
> I can do that. Note that sometimes more than one snapshot build is done
> on a given day; usually because I sometimes need to run test builds in
> the real environment. I'll probably just start assigning the builds a
> serial number and tag with that (and include it in the window title).
I'd prefer date and time; a serial number is just another nuisance
to find out about.